The table below lists review assignments. Each team is responsible for the timely submission of a draft report to the team they are reviewed by. Here are the ground rules:

• Your team will be graded based on the review that it writes, not on the review that it gets, so the review is strictly to your benefit, since it may point out weaknesses that you can correct before the final evaluation.
• A good review will do the following:
  • Recognize the organization and approach of the study, and identify and analyze the strengths and weaknesses.
  • Make concrete and practical recommendations for improvement.

• The review should be no longer than one page, and should be written as a joint team effort.

Review assignments

Se Jin Kwak and Jessica Terdeman	reviewed by	James Quarles and Kate Claeys
James Quarles and Kate Claeys	reviewed by	Se Jin Kwak and Jessica Terdeman
Maggie Hansen and Anna Dismuke	reviewed by	Lauren Dibianca and Heidi Shoemaker
Lauren Dibianca and Heidi Shoemaker	reviewed by	Maggie Hansen and Anna Dismuke
Insil Lee and Fang Wang	reviewed by	Batton Kennon and Chris Flass
Batton Kennon and Chris Flass	reviewed by	Insil Lee and Fang Wang
Reno Cho and Graham Peterson	reviewed by	Maressa Perrault and Serena Nelson
Maressa Perrault and Serena Nelson	reviewed by	Reno Cho and Graham Peterson
Kelly North and Sarah Kunkel	reviewed by	Michael Plehn and Giancarlo Mangone
Michael Plehn and Giancarlo Mangone	reviewed by	Kelly North and Sarah Kunkel
Noah Bolton and Lauren Hackney	reviewed by	Ryan McEnroe and Allison Quade
Ryan McEnroe and Allison Quade	reviewed by	Noah Bolton and Lauren Hackney
Suzanne Mathew and Robert Couch	reviewed by	Leslie McDonald and Kurt Petschke
Leslie McDonald and Kurt Petschke	reviewed by	Suzanne Mathew and Robert Couch
Emily Williamson and Sam Beall	reviewed by	Elana Ruff and Nima Govind
Elana Ruff and Nima Govind	reviewed by	Emily Williamson and Sam Beall
Ben Winn, Simon David, and Ben Trudel	reviewed by	Tony Lawson and Brian Williams
Patrick Nedney and Jay Cantrell	reviewed by	Ben Winn, Simon David, and Ben Trudel
Tony Lawson and Brian Williams	reviewed by	Patrick Nedney and Jay Cantrell

Schedule:

Mon Nov 5	During the lab meeting, give a copy of your draft to the team that is assigned to review it.
Mon Nov 12	At the beginning of lab, submit copies of your review and the reviewed paper both to me and to the team that wrote the paper, so you'll need two copies of both the reviewed report and the review. The lab meeting will be devoted to face-to-face meetings among the review groups to discuss the drafts and how to improve them.