84
84 74
83 74
83 73
82 73
89 82 79 73 69
93 89 82 79 72 69
93 88 82 79 72 69
99 93 88 82 78 72 68
99 92 87 82 77 71 67 64
99 92 86 81 76 71 67 64 59
96 92 86 81 76 71 67 63 59 39
96 91 86 81 76 71 66 63 57 54 44 39
95 90 86 80 75 70 66 61 56 54 49 43 37 23
95 90 85 80 75 70 66 61 55 51 46 42 35 28 21
Answers which predicted incorrect magnitudes but correct directions for the vertical reactions received most credit.
Answers which predicted incorrect directions (e.g. answers that could be identified as incorrect simply by looking) received less credit.
This problem could be solved by several methods. The example below shows one based on trigonometric calculations.
The example below shows a geometric approach, which produces an equivalent answer, although it identifies a different location on the object.
Many people correctly calculate the direction and magnitude of the force, but failed to consider the location on the object.
The example below has the following strong points:
A correct answer did the following:
a) Two answers were accepted for full credit: The loss of ductility which occurs when the concrete becomes the weak link; and the tendency for members with too much prestressing to bend upwards. The second answer is not strictly correct, since it is a problem of too much prestress, rather than too much reinforcing, that is, pulling tendons too tight, rather than having too many tendons), but was close enough to fit the scope fo the problem.
b) The following simple answer goes to the heart of the matter:
c) This question also had a simple answer (although cross referencing was not necessary).
d) There were two basic approaches to correct answers, the most common one being to accommodate movement especially due to temperature. Many answers failed to give a clear explanation of the source of the movement, or of how the roller would help improve the behavior. Another correct answer concerned using rollers to make a structure easier to analyze.