| Arch 721, Structural Design for Dynamic Loads,
University of Virginia Copyright © 1996-2006 Kirk Martini. 31-Oct-2007 11:43 |
Table
of Contents |
| 64 | |||||
| 64 | |||||
| 64 | |||||
| 64 | 59 | ||||
| 68 | 64 | 59 | |||
| 67 | 63 | 59 | |||
| 67 | 63 | 58 | |||
| 67 | 63 | 58 | |||
| 66 | 63 | 58 | 54 | ||
| 66 | 62 | 57 | 54 | ||
| 66 | 61 | 57 | 53 | ||
| 65 | 61 | 56 | 52 | ||
| 65 | 60 | 55 | 52 | 43 | 19 |
Maximum Possible 70; Mean: 59.4; Median 61
Problem 1
This is a clearly presented answer. Part c) could give more supporting explanation (e.g. offering a reason why the frequency of vibration increased when the stiffness was increased). The plot is very clearly labelled.


Question 2:
This is a well presented answer. Part c) includes a calculation for uplift, this was not required for full credit, but does no harm.




| Arch 721, Structural Design for Dynamic Loads,
University of Virginia Copyright © 1996-2006 Kirk Martini. 31-Oct-2007 11:43 |
Table
of Contents |